Political Drama Unfolds as Santanu Sen Challenges Suspension

Anton Kirichenko -

In the bustling city of Kolkata, there’s a significant buzz around former Trinamool MP Santanu Sen, who has taken a bold step by moving to the Calcutta High Court. The center of this unfolding drama is his challenge against the West Bengal Medical Council’s (WBMC) decision to strip him of his medical registration. Such drastic measures were taken due to what the council termed “infamous conduct.” Sen’s use of “FRCP” on his professional letterhead, a title he claims to honor from Glasgow, has ruffled feathers within the WBMC. As reported, Justice Amrita Sinha has permitted Sen to file this petition, and the legal showdown is set to proceed on Monday.

The Controversy over FRCP

The root of the controversy lies in the use of FRCP—Fellowship of the Royal College of Physicians. According to WBMC President Sudipto Roy, using this fellowship on a letterhead without registration is misleading and constitutes “infamous misconduct.” Sen rebutted this claim during a media interaction, insisting that he’d furnished all necessary documents to prove his credential’s legitimacy. “Though informed of the WBMC’s upcoming decision, I first learned of my suspension through media channels,” Sen remarked, describing the decision as “illegal” and driven by “personal vendetta.”

Political Underpinnings and Expert Opinions

The suspension has also drawn attention from the medical community, with many viewing it as an overreach influenced by political undertones. Prominent psychiatrist and IMA Bengal joint secretary, Ranjan Bhattacharyya, voiced his support for Sen, criticizing the decision as “uncalled for.” According to Times of India, critics argue that Sen’s actions didn’t infringe upon any norms of the WBMC or the IMC Act, hence raising questions about the motives behind the suspension.

The Path Ahead

Amid this turmoil, Sen remains firm in his stance. Despite depositing Rs 10,000 to have his FRCP recognized, he stands accused of non-compliance—a charge he vehemently denies. Advocates and political commentators are eagerly watching as Monday’s hearing approaches, hoping for clarity and fair judgment from the courts. This case not only highlights the intricacies of medical legitimacies but also underscores how political dynamics play influential roles in professional realms.

Wider Implications of the Case

As the story unfolds, eyes are set beyond the courtroom, towards the potential ramifications this case might have on political and medical circles in West Bengal. The decision bears weight on medical ethics and the extent to which professional titles should be regulated. While the drama unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between personal vindications and professional integrity.

This intricate tale of law, politics, and medicine promises not only to influence Sen’s career but could also set a precedent for how Medical Councils handle honorary titles in India, an ongoing topic of debate among professionals. As the case progresses, its impact on the professional world and its intertwining with political narratives will surely be watched with great interest.