Revolutionizing Game Labels: Why 'Kei' and 'Midi' Offer Fresh Insight

In the ever-evolving world of video game classifications, two new terms are making waves. Move over “AAA” and “Indie”; say hello to “Kei” and “Midi.” Not only are these new definitions refreshingly different, but they also tackle the long-standing struggle of categorizing games based on development scale with intriguing precision.

The Origins: A Data-Driven Approach

The innovative shift in game classification comes from the minds of Antoine Mayerowitz and Julie Belzanne. Their proposal, termed the Hushcrasher Classification System, seeks to redefine how we categorize video games by focusing on tangible data: the game’s file size and its credits list. It’s a fresh take that cuts through the noise of subjective interpretations associated with “vibes”. The main aim? Provide clarity where there was once confusion.

Beyond Imperfection: Embracing Novelty

While no system is without its flaws—exclusion of QA testers for data clarity being a contentious point—the appeal of the Hushcrasher system lies in its novelty. Unlike traditional methods that often feel confining, “Kei” and “Midi” allow for a more nuanced understanding of a game’s development scale. They reveal trends and clusters in the industry that were previously overshadowed.

The New Order: Size and Credits Matter

By primarily using game size in megabytes and the size of the credits list, these classifications map out the industry landscape, showing that more substantial game sizes and extensive credits don’t always equate to higher budgets. It’s a revelation that, while potentially leading to some unexpected results, offers a new lens for players and critics alike.

Cutting Through the Noise

The Hushcrasher system has been described as a method to “cut through the noise.” The detailed proposal includes supporting sales and classic genre data, furthering its credibility. For anyone curious to see where their favorite game fits into this new classification, the system allows for easy mapping, encouraging engagement with an otherwise complex topic.

Why ‘Kei’ and ‘Midi’ Matter

At the heart of this innovation is an attempt to offer a more adaptable framework for understanding the dynamic nature of game development. It acknowledges the complexities of the industry and provides a structured yet flexible approach to categorization. As stated in Aftermath, such attempts to innovate are what drive the industry forward.

In conclusion, while “Kei” and “Midi” may not solve all the challenges of game classification, they provide a refreshing alternative that encourages us to rethink how we talk about game development. As gamers, developers, or enthusiasts, embracing these new terms might just be the key to a better understanding of the video game frontier.

Enjoyed this examination of game classification? Share it and explore more insights with Aftermath!